Why should i study climate change




















Many plants are flowering earlier. Migrating birds arrive earlier, leave later and some even are getting smaller. Butterflies are emerging earlier. Birds and amphibians are laying their eggs earlier in the year. Some species are moving into new areas, such as kelps which form vital marine habitats. Seaweeds are important for many reasons. They act as vital habitats.

Some also help protect coastlines from erosion. Insects are one of the most vulnerable groups, with less ability than mammals or birds to escape warmer temperatures.

Loss of insects, which are a primary food source for many animals, a key pollinator of plants and whose numbers are already plummeting , could cause the ecosystem to collapse. In aquatic ecosystems, activities to mitigate the side effects of climate change, such as building hard flood defences, can have negative effects. As sea levels rise, sea walls reduce the space for intertidal ecosystems.

A rising sea could also damage important coastal habitats like sand dunes and cliffs. Joeri says, 'The ocean looks homogenous, but it also experiences variations. There are ocean heatwaves, where if a particularly warm mass of water comes to an area like coral reefs, it induces loss and mass dieback.

The loss of Arctic sea ice takes away a key habitat from animals including polar bears, seals and walruses. Climate change is just one of the stressors currently impacting nature. Sea use, invasive species, pollution and the exploitation of organisms are all factors in the threat to nature. Without drastic changes , it's expected that there will be devastating changes in biodiversity and ecosystems. Climate change has been a known problem for around 30 years.

Starting to fix it earlier might have made this daunting task much easier. Joeri says, 'We definitely know how to reduce emissions to a significant degree. We are seeing more impacts of climate change, but we can also see a heightened interest and concern in the general public. Over the past decades, scientists have estimated the potential impacts of the planet's average temperature rising by different amounts.

They want to be well below that and pursue efforts to make it as close as possible to 1. The difference in outcomes between 1. Scientists have determined how much carbon dioxide can still be emitted before this temperature rise limit will be exceeded.

This is called the carbon budget and it's relatively small. Joeri says, 'It's currently to billion tonnes of carbon dioxide for having a two-in-three or a one-in-two chance of limiting warming to 1.

So, if you start today and are going to net-zero emissions , if you want a one-in-two chance, we should there by around mid-century. Scientists then use engineering and economic models to understand how we can transform society to stay within that emission limit. There are many ways that you can help the planet. One way is by reducing the amount of meat and dairy you eat. This transformation could include changes such as increasing the share of energy produced by renewables, changing the way food is produced, changing our diets to have a lower carbon footprint and changing the way we build houses and design cities.

Moving to net-zero emissions will not be a perfectly co-ordinated transition. It will take some countries to lead and show the world that moving to this new way of living and functioning is both possible and beneficial for other sustainability objectives, such as public health and food security. Studying the climate helps us predict how much rain the next winter might bring, or how far sea levels will rise due to warmer sea temperatures.

We can also see which regions are most likely to be affected by extreme weather, or which wildlife species are threatened by climate change. You can check the weather by simply looking out the window. But you need a longer term set of observations to understand the climate.

We describe the climate by looking at temperature, rainfall, snow and wind data. Attainment of SDG 4 , which would raise the educational level of women, would enable this rate to be reduced so that by the world population would be 8. Furthermore, education helps people to adapt to climate change, because it improves their ability to assimilate information, calculate risks, prepare for climate crises and recover from their effects.

Training in these disciplines will enable young people to better understand the physical changes in their environment and provide them with the tools with which to combat climate change. A system of training along these lines will also train and qualify specialists for the green jobs that will be created in a green economy. Educational keys for combating climate change.

Whether as a separate subject or as a transversal theme in the school curriculum, it is essential to cultivate environmental values and knowledge among young people so that they can lead more sustainable lives. To stimulate their curiosity about the natural world and their concern for the health of the planet , appropriate teaching programmes must be promoted. Facilities must set an example and use energy efficiently, by, for example, using energy from renewable sources.

They must also promote efficient use of water and offer opportunities to interact with the environment. And they must be robust enough to withstand extreme weather events. Skip to main content. Future physicians must also advocate for changes to health infrastructure that make health care facilities more resilient to climate damage.

The Medical Society Consortium on Climate and Health is an organization already enlisting medical professionals to become advocates for the cause. Climate change scientists and researchers are constantly advancing our understanding of climate change.

However, their efforts would be in vain without policies aimed at enacting change. While global warming is a function of chemical processes by which atoms combine to form an imbalance of molecules, policy and markets directly affect how many of those molecules are in our atmosphere. In the perfect world, science would inform policy and policymakers would act in ways to forestall or prevent the future doom. In many political environments today, that is simply not happening.

The reasons humans ignore the science points toward a potentially catastrophic outcome. Conserving farmland by the acre and soil by the inch is a powerful strategy for reducing greenhouse gases and improving productivity. Farmers and ranchers can help reverse climate change by drawing down carbon from the air through practices that sequester carbon in the soil.

Environmental science, policy and management professor Whendee Silver has worked on carbon sequestration and suggests that farmers can slow global warming by improving the soil quality on their farms. Her claim?



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000